† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51702003, 61775087, and 11674312), the Provincial Foundation for Excellent Top Talents of Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province of China (Grant No. gxgwfx2019016), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant Nos. 1808085ME130 and 1508085QF140), University Outstanding Young Talents Support Program Fund (Grant No. gxyqZD2018039).
We theoretically investigate the optical absorption coefficient (OAC) in asymmetrical Gaussian potential quantum dots subject to an applied electric field. Confined wave functions together with energies of electron energies in an effective mass approximation framework are obtained. The OAC is expressed according to the iterative method and the compact-density-matrix approach. Based on our results, OAC is sensitively dependent on external electric field together with the incident optical intensity. Additionally, peak shifts into greater energy as the quantum dot radius decrease. Moreover, the parameters of Gaussian potential have a significant influence on the OAC.
Recently, many low-dimensional semiconductor systems including quantum dots (QDs) and other confined nanostructures have been studied. Due to the discrete energy levels and unique optical characters, much attention has been focused on both colloid QDs[1–4] and self-assembly QDs.[5,6] Compared with bulk materials, confined nanostructures have significantly different nonlinear optical properties.[7–10] Particularly, electric field application has been extensively studied for the semiconductor nanostructures.[11–13] In recent years, tremendous efforts are made to examine those optical as well as electronic characteristics for QDs, where carrier motion is restricted at each spatial direction. External static electric field can modify electron optical properties and transport within QDs. The electric field applied can result in carrier distribution polarization, along with quantum state energy shift, where the intensity of optoelectronic devices can be controlled and modulated effectively. Therefore, the electric field effect on the carrier within QDs deserves investigation.
The optical absorption coefficient (OAC) with semiconductor nanostructures has aroused wide attention over the last few years.[14–16] Many researchers considered the electric field effect when investigating the OAC. For instance, Mandal et al.[17] have studied the OAC of QDs under noise, electric and magnetic fields, confinement potential. Zhang et al.[18] have investigated the OAC and the refractive index changes within the asymmetrical Gaussian potential quantum well in the presence of an applied external electric field. Çakır et al.[19] reported the magnetic field impacts on linear and nonlinear OACs in spherical QDs. Ghajarpour et al.[20] examined hydrogenic impurity, magnetic and electric fields on the OAC within QDs. Al et al.[21] have analyzed the electric field impacts on the binding energy and the OAC within the Tietz-Hua quantum well. In all the above-mentioned articles, authors proposed electric and magnetic fields, the external perturbation on the OAC. In this paper, we mainly investigate the OAC within an asymmetrical Gaussian potential QD when an external electric field is applied, although extreme nonlinear optics is another important research hotspot of nonlinear optics and a lot of important research results have been obtained.[22–25]
The numerical research on the OAC within the asymmetrical Gaussian potential QD when an external electric field is applied is presented in this study. To be specific, a theoretical framework is presented in Section
In the effective mass approximation framework, the Schrödinger equation of the system is given by[26,27]
In addition, electron eigenenergies E is determined according to the equation
Within the iterative and compact-density matrix approaches, the analytical expressions for the linear and third-order nonlinear susceptibilities are calculated by[28,29]
For the above-mentioned equations, μ stands for the system permeability, εR represents the actual permittivity, ε0 suggests the free space permittivity, I indicates incident optical intensify, c indicates light speed, nr represents refractive index, Mij = |〈Ψi|ez|Ψj〉|(i,j = 1,2), Eij = Ei – Ej suggests an energy interval between two distinct electronic states. Moreover, the overall coefficients of optical absorption are expressed as
This section introduces the third-order nonlinear, linear, as well as total OAC within a GaAs/AlGaAs QD in the presence of an applied external electric field. The following parameters are used for calculation, m* = 0.067m0, (where m0 is the electron mass), nr = 3.2, T12 = 0.2 ps, Γ12 = 1/T12, σν = 5×1024 m−3, μ = 4π×10−7 Hm−1.[30,31]
Figure
Figure
The total OAC based on the incident photon energy with four distinct L values is displayed in Fig.
For investigating quantum dot radius effect on the total OAC, we plot the total OAC based on the incident photon energy for three distinct R values. It can be known from Fig.
Figure
Total OAC based on the incident photon energy with three distinct I values is illustrated in Fig.
In this paper, the OAC in the QD is effectively investigated. Our calculations mainly concentrate on the OAC dependency on the electric field F, the QD radius R, Gaussian potential V0 and L parameters, and incident optical intensity I. According to our findings, the OAC theoretical value markedly elevates because of the Gaussian potential range and the electric field applied, but the peak value will decrease as the R, V0 and I increase. Moreover, with the QD radius increasing, the resonant peaks of the OAC shift toward lower energy area. Our results are more remarkable than those in the previous work.[19] Hopefully, this research can provide certain foundation for experimental and theoretical work on optical devices.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] |